April 19, 2011

Americans in Canada: A Taxing Situation

By Terry F. Ritchie
Originally published in Advisor's Edge


Much has been written about the planning issues of Canadians moving to the U.S. But how many advisors are aware of the issues Americans face when they move to Canada or already reside here?

Many U.S. citizens move to Canada and stop filing U.S. tax returns because they’re unaware it’s still required of them. But these individuals will face a rude awakening once the HIRE Act comes into effect January 1, 2013 and they’re slapped with 30% withholding charges on investment earnings for remission to the IRS.

U.S. citizens are currently required by law to file a U.S. tax return annually and declare their worldwide income, including any Canadian-source income, investment income and capital gains, adjusted for U.S. dollars – despite the fact they no longer physically live in the U.S. or earn any income there.

Residency rules 

Canada, on the other hand, doesn’t impose income tax based on citizenship. The term “resident” is not defined in the Canadian Income Tax Act. As a result, the basis for confirming a person’s residence has been established through the courts, certain statutory rules and the CRA’s interpretations.

The determination of one’s residence is generally a question of fact. According to case law, an individual is a resident of Canada for tax purposes if Canada is the place where the individual, in the settled routine of his or her life, regularly, normally or customarily lives. According to CRA Interpretation Bulletin IT-221R3, where an individual enters Canada, other than as a sojourner (a temporary resident), and establishes residential ties within Canada, that person will generally be considered to have become a resident of Canada for tax purposes on the date he or she entered Canada.

The primary residential ties of an individual are a dwelling, dependants, personal property and social ties. So when an American moves to Canada for employment or retirement purposes with his or her family and acquires a new primary residence, it’s very likely the income tax residency for Canadian purposes will be determined to have occurred as of the day he or she entered Canada.

Once income tax residency is established in Canada, these individuals will be deemed to have disposed of, immediately beforehand, all of their property, with some exceptions, for proceeds equal to the fair market value of the property at that time. They are then deemed to have acquired at the particular time such property at a cost equal to such fair market value.

In effect, at the date of establishing Canadian residency, they are entitled to a step-up in the tax cost of all property owned for purposes of determining the ultimate capital gain or tax loss implications upon a future sale, the settling of a trust, or at death in Canada. So it’s important for clients who move to Canada to establish fair market values of all property as of the date they determined.

Canadian income tax residency

When residency in Canada is established, individuals are considered by the United States to be not only residents of Canada, but also of the U.S. for income tax purposes. This could lead to the presumption that they are subject to double taxation on their worldwide income. But in most cases, such exposure can generally be eliminated or reduced through the use of the U.S. foreign-earned income exclusion (FEI) and/or the use of foreign tax credits.

The FEI, in effect, eliminates up to US$91,500 (for 2010) of Canadian-source employment income from U.S. income tax as long as the U.S. resident taxpayer meets one of two tests, which apply if the taxpayer is out of the U.S. for one year or more. (Note: this relates only to employment income, and doesn’t include other forms of worldwide income such as investment income or capital gains.) Also, given that net income tax rates are generally higher in Canada, U.S. taxpayers who are resident in Canada for tax purposes are entitled to reduce or eliminate exposure to U.S. tax through the use of foreign tax credits.

Advisors in Canada focus a lot of attention on the reduction of Canadian tax for these types of clients (through the use of flow-through shares, large RRSP contributions, etc.), but they often don’t recognize the net U.S. tax results of some of this type of planning. Flow-through shares, for example, will not provide any U.S. tax relief and often create additional U.S. tax and other compliance headaches. So it’s important to tax-plan with both jurisdictions in mind.

Additional reporting requirements

In addition to reporting world income on their U.S. tax return, advisors should also be aware of their American clients’ requirement to file U.S. Department of Treasury Form TD F 90-22.1 – Report on Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts, similar to Canadian Form T1135. On this form, U.S. citizens must disclose their interest in financial accounts outside of the U.S. Failure to do so could lead to criminal prosecution with penalties as high as US$500,000 and ten years in jail.

Americans in Canada must also be careful about the establishment of a Canadian trust or the ownership of certain kinds of Canadian investments, including mutual funds, income trusts and registered plans (including RESPs and TFSAs). These may require the filing of Form 3520 – Annual Return to Report Transactions With Foreign Trusts and Receipt of Certain Foreign Gifts and Form 3520A – Annual Information Return of Foreign Trust with a US Owner.

In this case, the penalties can be as high as 5% of the value of the investments and up to 35% of any distributions from Canadian investments, trusts, registered plans and TFSAs. If clients were ever to establish an RRSP, they would also need to file Form 8891 – US Information Return for Beneficiaries of Certain Canadian Registered Retirement Savings Plans.

Finally, if U.S. citizens in Canada establish a Canadian company or take an equity interest in a Canadian company, they might need to file Form 5471 – Information Return of US Persons With Respect To Foreign Corporations, and another whole myriad of IRS filing requirements and penalties would be imposed.

The HIRE Act

On March 18, 2010, President Obama passed into law the HIRE Act, the primary purpose of which was to extend unemployment benefits for those entitled to them. However, buried within the new law is some rather alarming legislation aimed at non-compliant American taxpayers in Canada and around the world.

No longer will American taxpayers be able to escape the clutches of the IRS. In fact, your friendly Canadian financial institution will be helping the IRS out. Starting on January 1, 2013, Canadian banks or investment firms, if they intend to do business with any U.S. persons, will have to ask every account holder whether they are a U.S. citizen or resident.

If so, the bank will be required to report information related to the account to the IRS. If an account holder refuses to answer (what will be referred to as a recalcitrant account holder), the bank or investment firm will withhold 30% of any investment earnings and remit that to the IRS. Advisors should therefore encourage their U.S.-citizen clients who haven’t been filing U.S. returns annually to meet the compliance requirements of the IRS prior to this legislation coming into full force.

Generally, the IRS requires such taxpayers to file the previous six years’ returns. In most cases, after the application of the FEI and foreign tax credits, no additional U.S. tax will likely be required. But it can be a lot of work and the additional IRS compliance forms (Forms 8891, 3520, etc.) will be required.

Exit taxes

In light of this new legislation, should Americans in Canada consider giving up their U.S. citizenship?

Unfortunately, this route is not an easy solution. By law, the U.S. can now impose a deemed exit tax on the worldwide assets (including assets in Canada) against those individuals who choose to give up their U.S. citizenship.

U.S. and Canadian retirement and other deferred plans can also be hit with a 30% withholding tax at the time of expatriation.

Further, if a client hasn’t filed U.S. tax returns in the past, they’ll be forced to file returns for the last five years and have them certified in order to be able to expatriate. They’ll also have to provide full financial disclosure on worldwide assets.For some clients, this might be a viable option, but it’s important for advisors to fully understand the implication of this option, as transfers from a “covered expatriate” to a U.S. citizen or resident (family member, etc.) would subject the recipient of the transfer to a gift tax (after the annual gift tax exclusion) of 45%!

Other considerations

As many advisors may be aware, there is currently no U.S. estate tax. But after so many high-profile billionaire deaths this year, including Mary Cargill of Cargill Inc. ($1.7 billion), Dan Duncan of Enterprise Energy ($9 billion), Walter Shorenstein ($1.1 billion) and more recently, George Steinbrenner of the NY Yankees ($1.1 billion), the likelihood of a retroactive U.S. estate tax becomes more probable.

Unless Congress does something this year, the U.S. estate tax comes back into full force on January 1, 2011, with an exemption of $1 million and a maximum rate of 55%. But with U.S. mid-term elections in November 2010 and the potential for Republican control of the U.S. House and Senate, anything’s possible.

As with income tax residency, U.S. citizens residing in Canada will be considered residents of the U.S. for estate and gift tax purposes. Therefore, it’s critical that advisors plan for any U.S. estate tax exposure.

This planning can be achieved through the proper drafting of Canadian wills with appropriate U.S. estate planning language and through Spousal Rollover or Qualified Domestic Trusts (if married).

The role of life insurance (held through an Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust), charitable bequests at death and irrevocable trusts for U.S. beneficiaries should also be considered.



Terry Ritchie, CFP (U.S.), RFP (Canada), TEP, EA, a Calgary-based cross-border financial planner with expertise in both American and Canadian tax regimes, and co-author of The Canadian Snowbird in America, The Canadian in America, and The American in Canada

Posted by Terry F. Ritchie, editor@Advisor.ca.  

March 1, 2011

Thinking of a little cross-border real estate shopping?

The Globe and Mail article, featuring Terry Ritchie, published March 1, 2011.


by PREET BANERJEE, Globe and Mail Update
  
The loonie is above parity with the U.S. greenback, and U.S. real estate is under water. You wouldn't be the first person to think a due-diligence trip is in order to snap up properties costing as low as half their pre-meltdown price. But before booking your flight, take a look at the tax implications.

“It’s important for the Canadian to have a clear understanding of what their overall objective for buying the property is,” says Terry Ritchie, a financial planner with Transition Financial Advisors Group, and co-author of The Canadian Snowbird of America. His firm specializes in cross-border financial planning.

If the property is being used for personal reasons, there are generally no annual U.S. or Canadian income-tax implications until the real estate is sold or rented out.

Tax reporting kicks in when the property is used for investment purposes. Landlords must file a U.S. income-tax return every year and can deduct any reasonable expenses from the rent they receive, says Mr. Ritchie. If you and your spouse are joint owners, then you both must file a return by June 15 of the year following the rental activity.

You’ll also have to think about the cost of depreciation on the property, which is mandatory under U.S. tax laws. “In many cases, when depreciation is factored against the other expenses, most Canadians might see a net loss for U.S. tax purposes,” Mr. Ritchie says. Loss or not, you still have to file a return.

Once you sell your real estate, you may also have to file a state tax return, depending on where it is. You could also face a 10 per cent federal withholding tax on the proceeds, though that may be reduced. You can claim a reduction or an elimination of the tax entirely, for example, if you sold at a loss. You’d have to file separate forms to get that money back from the government.

And it doesn’t end there: Your estate may also need to pay U.S. estate taxes. However, most of us won't have to worry too much about this as it generally only applies if your worldwide estate is over $5-million individually or $10-million as a couple.

Mr. Ritchie's last bit of advice is to “make hay while the sun shines.”

The loonie is rising. As of noon yesterday, it was worth about $1.03 U.S., its highest position in three years.

The combination of a high loonie and low real estate prices might be as good as it gets, so seize the opportunity now and avoid the temptation to speculate on future currency and real estate price moves.

But I caution you to find a professional well versed in cross-border real estate investments or you could find your sunny southern investment parade being rained on by the tax and administrative headaches.

U.S. prices, then and now
 
Median market value for a home in four U.S. markets adjusted to Canadian dollars:

Fort Lauderdale
 
Dec. 1, 2006: $399,451
Dec. 1, 2010: $172,500

New York City
 
Dec. 1, 2006: $553,966
Dec. 1, 2010: $457,178

Upper West Side, New York
 
Dec. 1, 2006: $1,081,606
Dec. 1, 2010: $917,098

San Francisco
 
Dec. 1, 2006: $901,911
Dec. 1, 2010: $680,788

Seattle
 
Dec. 1, 2006: $516,195
Dec. 1, 2010: $349,690

Sources: Zillow.com, Bank of Canada

Preet Banerjee is a senior vice-president with Pro-Financial Asset Management.  His website is:  WhereDoesAllMyMoneyGo.com


Video
Snowbirds: Buying U.S. real estate?  Feat. Terry Ritchie

Video

Money tips for snowbirds  Feat. Terry Ritchie



 

January 25, 2011

The Canadian Snowbird in America Seminar

A Portion of The Canadian Snowbird Presentation given in Phoenix, Arizona on January 20, 2011.

December 20, 2010

U.S. Estate Tax Certainty Begins in the New Year

US-Capitol-Building_feature

Last Friday, the Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization, and Job Creation Act of 2010 was passed and signed by President Obama. Since U.S. lawmakers seem to like to use acronyms a lot, I thought I’d give this one a try myself. How does TRUIRJCA sound? Don’t quote me on that. Let’s just call it the 2010 Act.

As you recall from my previous article, “U.S. Estate Tax Uncertainty Still Exists” from last week, one of the more surprising elements of the new 2010 Act relates to the increased U.S. estate basic exemption of $5 million and lower maximum rate of 35%. This will – for at least the next 2 years – reduce the level of estate tax exposure for many Americans in Canada and those Canadians who own U.S. real estate or U.S. shares personally.

New Rate and Exclusion Amounts

The rate at which the 35% maximum rate kicks in is when the taxable estate exceeds $500,000. Based on the new maximum estate rate of 35%, the unified credit or “tax” on the basic exclusion amount of $5 million would now be $1,730,800. That would now be the number that would be utilized under the Canada-U.S. Tax Treaty to determine the pro-rated credit available for Canadians owning U.S. situs property.

I have put together a few hypothetical examples of the level of what the net U.S. estate exposure would be assuming various worldwide estate and values of personally held U.S. assets (like real estate or U.S. shares). As you will notice and as my previous article pointed out, the levels of exposure are substantially reduced – at least for the next 2 years – for single Canadians with a U.S. dollar worldwide estate of less than $5 million or Canadian married couples with a U.S. dollar worldwide estate of less than $10 million.

World Estate $2.5M
Single
$2.5M
Married
$5M
Single
$5M
Married
$10M
Single
$10M
Married
US Situs Value $500,000 $500,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000
Estate Tax $155,800 $155,800 $330,800 $330,800 $330,800 $330,800
Pro-Rated Credit $356,160 $356,160 $356,160 $356,160 $178,080 $178,080
Marital Credit N/A $356,160 N/A $356,160 N/A $178,080







Net Estate Tax NIL NIL NIL NIL $152,720 NIL

U.S. estate planning for a married couple where the surviving spouse will likely have a gross estate of greater than the basic exclusion amount will still be required to reduce or eliminate any U.S. estate at the surviving spouse’s death. This can be achieved through ownership planning (tenants in common) or through the role of a spousal trust within the first to dies will or other trust planning. Life insurance could also be used to cover estate exposure, however, special planning would be required to ensure that the proceeds would not form part of the decedent’s worldwide estate. Planning using a non-recourse mortgage – although hard to find – could also be used for U.S. real estate ownership.

Portability Provisions

One of the more interesting elements of the 2010 Act provides for “portablility” of the exclusion amount between U.S. citizen spouses. This allows the surviving spouse to elect to take advantage of the unused portion of the estate exclusion from the predeceased spouse’s estate. This should provide the surviving spouse’s estate with a much larger exclusion amount. This type of planning was typically achieved for U.S. married couples through the use of “credit shelter” or “bypass trusts” within wills in Canada or more often than not, Trusts in the U.S.

To give you an example of how this would work, let’s assume that John has an estate worth $3 million and his wife Ruth has an estate worth $4 million. Assuming that John dies in 2011, his estate would pay no U.S. estate tax ($5M exclusion exceeds his $3M estate). Ruth would now have an estate of $7 million ($4M herself + John’s $3M estate) Assuming that Ruth were to die in 2012 with an estate of $7M she would be entitled to use John’s unused $2 million exclusion along with her own exclusion of $5 million which would eliminate her exposure to U.S. estate tax. John would have had to make an election on his estate tax return to allow Ruth to use his unused exclusion amount.

Apparently, under the new law, if the surviving spouse is predeceased by more than one spouse, the exclusion amount available for use by the surviving spouse would be limited to the lesser of $5 million or the unused exclusion of the last deceased spouse.

Fun stuff. Well the fun begins again in another 2 years. As I ended my last article……Stay tuned!

Terry F. Ritchie is a Calgary and Phoenix based advisor with Transition Financial Advisors (www.transitionfinancial.com) who specializes in U.S./Canada financial, tax and estate planning matters. He is the co-author of the books, The Canadian in America, The Canadian Snowbird in America and The American in Canada (www.ecwpress.com).

Filed by Terry F. Ritchie, editor@Advisor.ca

Originally published on Advisor.ca

December 13, 2010

U.S. Estate Uncertainty Still Exists


usaflag08_feature

Grandma still has time to get run over by a reindeer.

Could it be? An early Christmas present from President Obama and the U.S. Congress? Well, if the Democrats in the U.S. House get their way over the next few days, that present will be a little smaller.

So what am I talking about?

As many advisors are aware, based on U.S. laws passed in June of 2001, U.S. estate tax was repealed in 2010 and was expected to return at the beginning of the New Year with an exemption amount of $1 million and a maximum estate tax rate of 55%. If you recall, the rate in 2009 – prior to repeal this year – was 45% and an exemption amount of $3.5 million.

However, as part of the President’s efforts to resolve the uncertainty around increasing U.S. income and estate tax rates and laws at the beginning of the year, President Obama struck a deal with the Republicans which included provisions for the return of the U.S. estate tax at a maximum rate of 35% and a per individual exemption of $5 million.

Although Senators Jon Kyl (Republican from AZ) and Blanche Lincoln (Democrat from AR) had previously introduced the same exemption and rate as the President is proposing earlier in the year, they were defeated and no one (I mean NO ONE) expected these to be reintroduced as part of the President’s bipartisan deal.

As of this writing, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has accepted the new proposed Estate rate and exemption. However, House Majority Leader Nancy Pelosi is holding firm and looking for the 2009 rate and exemption amounts of 45% and $3.5 million.

We should have greater clarity of how things will shake out in the next few days and very likely before the end of the year.

Despite the increased exemption and lower rate than most advisors expected, there are some other interesting provisions that will likely be part of the new law.

What has been proposed is that the new rate and exemption will only be available for 2011 and 2012. Unless Congress makes these laws permanent before the end of 2012, the estate tax rate would return to 55% with a $1 million exemption on January 1, 2013.

The new estate tax exemption would include provisions for indexing beginning in 2012 – even though we still have uncertainty beyond 2012.

The new law will likely include what is referred to as “portability” provisions. This would be an interesting addition within the new law as it would now automatically allow the surviving spouse the ability to utilize the deceased spouse’s unused estate tax exemption. This would diminish or reduce the need to establish specific trusts often referred to as “bypass”, “credit shelter” or “A/B” trusts as part of the estate plan.

Lastly, the new law would unite the estate, gift and generation-skipping taxes with the same maximum rate of 35% and have the $5 million exemption apply for all three taxes.

In terms of those of us who have clients who are either U.S. citizens resident in Canada or clients where one of the spouses is a U.S. citizen, this could significantly reduce the level of U.S. estate tax exposure and planning requirements that they would traditionally face.

Further, for those Canadians who would be contemplating the purchase of U.S. real estate for investment or personal use purposes, the more complicated planning playing field might be reduced somewhat given that U.S. estate tax exposure would only exist if the single Canadian decedent’s worldwide estate was greater than U$5 million or U$10 million for a married Canadian couple.

Stay tuned……

  • Terry Ritchie, CFP (U.S.), RFP (Canada), TEP, EA, a Calgary-based cross-border financial planner with expertise in both American and Canadian tax regimes, and co-author of The Canadian Snowbird in America, The Canadian in America, and The American in Canada
  • Filed by Terry F. Ritchie, editor@Advisor.ca

    Originally published on Advisor.ca